Audio
Archive
2013
January
February
March
April
May
2012
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2011
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2010
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2009
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2008
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2007
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Subscribe
May. 09, 2008
Eat Local? Or Eat Differently?
|
|
|
Tweet |
|
When it comes to greenhouse gas emissions, what you eat may be more important than where that food comes from, a new study finds. Writing in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, researchers report that replacing the calories from red meat and dairy products in one day's worth of your diet with calories from chicken, fish, or vegetables could have the same impact on greenhouse gas emissions as shifting to an entirely locally-grown diet. "Eating local' has become an important concept among the environmentally conscious in recent years. The impact on greenhouse gas emissions of becoming a locavore, however, may not be as big as proponents would like. "Our analysis shows that despite all the attention given to food miles, the distance that food travels is only around 11% of the average American household’s food-related greenhouse gas emissions," said Chris Weber, one of the authors of the report. In this segment, Ira talks with Weber about the study's results and about the impact of dietary choices on greenhouse gases. |
Produced by Annette Heist, Senior Producer
Guests
-
Christopher Weber
Assistant Research Professor, Civil and Environmental
Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania


Discussion